|
From: | Christopher Waid |
Subject: | Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news |
Date: | Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:16:27 -0400 |
On 2016-08-25 06:26 PM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and eventhe issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no needto make everyone mad at each other.It's not just about terminology. It's about deliberately misinforming the people to back your project because it's been libre hardware andlibre software "right from the beginning". And also misinforming people to think it's OK for their freedom to buy laptops with proprietary BIOSrather than with Libreboot.Richard Stallman has just confirmed me that FSF has not received the PCBdesign sources along with the Libre Tea Computer Card. I hope that now everyone understands that this EOMA68 board is *not* libre hardware as claimed.
That doesn't make it "*not* libre hardware" as far as the FSF is concerned. The FSF *DOES NOT* require the PCB designs for RYF. They are not involved in or concerned with the release of schematics. The end user can't do anything with schematics like they can with libre software. This source code is what the FSF is concerned with.
What has to be released is the complete set of corresponding source code. Everything else is extra and is being released out of our goodwill. No promises have not been kept as the crowd funding page clearly says the schematics will be released. As a gesture of goodwill everything else already has been.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |