[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree
From: |
Lyberta |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:16:00 +0000 |
Luke:
> ungoogled-chromium is close, and there is no reason why we shouldn't
> start using it right now.
> It would be nice to see Debian and others officially adapt this
> patch-set as well.
>
> I am still unsure whether or not we will be able to apply the patches to
> embedded Chromium (such as QTWebengine), but that would be optimal as well.
>
>
Does the same apply to Chromium Embedded Framework? Is it also non-free?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/17
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Luke, 2017/01/17
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/22
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/22
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Jim Garrett, 2017/01/22
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Luke, 2017/01/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/22
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree, Luke, 2017/01/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree,
Lyberta <=
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree, Isaac David, 2017/01/14