[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:24:12 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:05:58 -0500 Cal wrote:
>> GitHub requires proprietary software (JavaScript).
>
> most of the github website is functional with librejs, including opening bug
> reports and commenting on existing ones
Yes, it’s indeed much more freedom-friendly than, say, GitLab, which is is one
of those wretched websites, that are not even _readable¹_ without running
ad-hoc nonfree software, yet ironically widely believed to be a better
alternative.
However, GitHub still imposes nonfree software on you at the moment of
registration. Due to its nature — it’s a CAPTCHA, that is it designed to be
unavoidable, there hardly any solution exists.
-
¹ GitLab is actually even more miserable in that respect, than something like
https://code.gov, which honestly shows you faceplate, informing you, that its
developers were unable to create a proper web-interface. GitLab, on the other
hand, presents an _incomplete_ page without any notice, basically lying to an
unaware visitor.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Cal, 2019/03/27
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, bill-auger, 2019/03/27
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub,
Dmitry Alexandrov <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub, Cal, 2019/03/27
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub, bill-auger, 2019/03/27
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub, Aaron Wolf, 2019/03/28
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Issues on GitHub, Leah Rowe, 2019/03/28
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Issues on GitHub, Matt Lee, 2019/03/28