Re: Patchy email

[David Kastrup]

Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 26.07.19 20:36, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Unless Knut is also running patchy now that he has commit access (and
>>> perhaps didn't have a clean master?).
>>>
>>> (I don't want to cast aspersions, but it might be a genuine mistake if
>>> it was Knut). Knut?
>> I rather doubt that it was Knut since I mentioned the procedures to him
>> right now and you said that you pushed the patch in question anyway (so
>> it's very unlikely that he'd run the patchy subsequently responsible for
>> promoting it to master).
> I never used patchy. According to my memories and according to my logs
> pushing the commits to staging was done right and successful.
>
> But yes, there is a local branch master on my system. I never thought that
> there is a clone of the lilypond repository without a local master as
>
>    git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
>
>
> clones the repository and checks out 'master'. Sorry for the mess.
>
> It's clear that 7583351fbf2f08a4d1f3f0b075fe8b691adc0b95 needs
> to be fixed.
>
> What happened to the musicxml2ly patch? It vanished from staging.
> Shall I push it again?

It didn't pass patchy testing on my computer with failures in the
musicxml files.  So it appears to have a problem with, uh, Python
2.7.16+ (according to python --version on my current Ubuntu).  If you
need more pointers, I can try getting useful logs.

-- 
David Kastrup