Re: New release

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2020, 09:05 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Montag, den 13.07.2020, 22:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > Am Montag, den 13.07.2020, 21:07 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:49 PM Phil Holmes <email@philholmes.net> wrote:
> > > > I created a new release today.  I know that (again) I got the news 
> > > > wrong and
> > > > will need to fix that.  However, it looks like the web docs are 
> > > > probably not
> > > > correctly picking up a style sheet (see
> > > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/contributor/index_1#Introduction-to-contributing
> > > > as a simple example) - they're certainly not presented correctly.  Could
> > > > anyone say what has gone wrong and what needs to be done to fix it?
> > > 
> > > the 2.21 docs are missing a tocframe section in the manpages. Could
> > > this be a fallout of the recent texi2html work?
> > 
> > Ouch, that doesn't look good, but probably related to my work. (For all
> > of the changes, I looked at diffs of the HTML docs before and after my
> > changes and all looked clean, but that's only my environment...)
> > 
> > From what I saw during a quick look, it could be our init file wasn't
> > loaded at all - for example, all cross-links are prefixed with the
> > linked book. I don't remember seeing this locally (does this happen for
> > anyone?), so one possible difference is the Perl version. GUB has
> > version 5.10 which is ... ancient. It could be that I'm using
> > *something* (no Perl expert) that breaks loading the file in GUB. I'll
> > investigate tomorrow.
> 
> Pretty good guess:
> $ ../gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/perl -c 
> Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init 
> Bareword found where operator expected at 
> Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init line 827, near "s/<li>/<li 
> class="toc_current">/r"
> syntax error at Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init line 827, near 
> "s/<li>/<li class="toc_current">/r"
> Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init had compilation errors.
> 
> Okay, so let's do it the old way:
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/246
> (not tested with GUB yet, will do later today)

Took until today, but I can confirm it works with GUB on my system.

(Note to future me: Don't include "-doc" in your branch name when
testing with GUB. Just don't. GUB will strip the suffix and complain
that it can't find the branch - big surprise...)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part