[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding
From: |
Owen Lamb |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:05:25 -0700 |
Hmm... Washida is already a Japanese surname, which might cause confusion.
If you'd really like to dissociate your area from Florida, all I can offer
is going further northwest: Alaskida or Floraska. But then to be consistent
we'd have to take Hawaii into account, and it doesn't play well with such
an Anglo-Saxon name as Maine! Ha...maine? Hawaiine? Mawaii?
Hey, that last one actually doesn't sound half bad! ...oh wait, it's a
lotion brand.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:18 PM Aaron Hill <lilypond@hillvisions.com> wrote:
> On 2020-07-23 4:28 pm, Owen Lamb wrote:
> > (It starts to get confusing to keep track of diagonal directions after
> > a
> > while, so for the sake of clarity, I'll be talking about diamonds with
> > thick NE and SW sides as Calimaine, and those with thick NW and SE
> > sides as
> > Florington, after the states roughly in the corresponding corners of
> > the
> > continental U.S. A bit fanciful, but the portmanteaus are easier to
> > distinguish than jumbles of capital letters.)
>
> Hmm... "Calimaine" sounds like a lotion.
>
> But why not "Washida"? While we have our problems up here in the
> Pacific Northwest, I am mildly displeased at having to be associated
> with Florida in the first place and more so with them getting top
> billing. :P
>
> (For the record, I am a Washingtonian who lived in Florida for several
> years, so I have experience with both states, notwithstanding a
> childhood spent in Kansas, Misery [sic], and briefly New Jersey. There
> are few US stereotypes I have not yet had to contend with.)
>
>
> -- Aaron Hill
>
>
- GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/20
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/20
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Aaron Hill, 2020/07/21
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, David Kastrup, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Karlin High, 2020/07/23
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Owen Lamb, 2020/07/23
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Aaron Hill, 2020/07/23
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding,
Owen Lamb <=
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, James, 2020/07/24
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Karlin High, 2020/07/23
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Karlin High, 2020/07/23
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Carl Sorensen, 2020/07/21
- Message not available
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, David Kastrup, 2020/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Karlin High, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Carl Sorensen, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Karlin High, 2020/07/22
- Re: GSoC 2020: Shape-note notehead encoding, Carl Sorensen, 2020/07/22