[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tie over clef change
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: tie over clef change |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 12:50:10 -0400 |
On Sep 26, 2020, at 12:34, Hans Åberg <haberg-1@telia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 26 Sep 2020, at 18:04, Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2020, at 09:41, Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> wrote:
>>>
>>> What kind of grob would an editor expect here? a Tie because it connects
>>> notes of the same pitch, or a Slur because it connects notes at different
>>> staff positions? (or something else?)
>>
>> I'll answer my own question. A tie from d♯ to e♭ generates a Tie grob, so
>> for consistency, this should be a Tie that looks like a slur.
>
> The notes d♯ to e♭ have different pitches in the staff notation system, which
> cannot express E12 enharmonic equivalents, so this is slur. So it should be a
> slur that looks like slur.
I see. Then that's a different case from Werner's example where the pitch is
really the same. So the question is unanswered.
—
Dan
- tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Kevin Barry, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26