[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date in footer?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: date in footer? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:33:57 +0100 |
2009/4/25 Neil Puttock <address@hidden>:
> Perhaps the point I was trying to make got lost in my slightly
> facetious reply: if we're talking about LSR snippets which are in the
> docs, the LSR editor must be mindful of the fact that editing such
> examples in LSR may have no effect, since they can be shadowed by
> revised snippets in input/lsr.
...or even `revised snippets in input/new.' :)
- Re: date in footer?, (continued)
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23