[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date in footer?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: date in footer? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:13:45 +0100 |
2009/4/28 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> 2009/4/26 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>
>> > This is easily solved; the python script that copies from
>> > input/new/ to input/lsr/ should add a "This snippet only works in
>> > 2.13"; that way, the LSR editor can easily see such snippets from
>> > browsing the docs.
>>
>> We already have a comment which says where the snippets come from,
>> even if it doesn't explain why a particular example has been generated
>> from input/new. If we're going to expand on this message, I'd like it
>> to be based on \version, i.e., "This snippet only works from version
>> x.y.z".
>
> +1
Done.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: date in footer?, (continued)
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Chip, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/24