[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] MAKEFLAGS
|
From: |
Greg Chicares |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] MAKEFLAGS |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:22:25 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 |
On 3/9/21 2:28 PM, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
[...]
> If we really want to discuss the makefiles (but I'm not sure if we do), a
> more interesting question might be whether we really need a separate
> workhorse.make at all. I did read the paper[1] which inspired this approach
> but I happen to completely disagree with it
Reversing so fundamental a decision now would be a major undertaking,
upon which I wouldn't want to embark because I don't believe the
benefits could justify the cost.
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, (continued)
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/07
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Vadim Zeitlin, 2021/03/07
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/07
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Vadim Zeitlin, 2021/03/07
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/07
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Vadim Zeitlin, 2021/03/08
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/08
- Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Vadim Zeitlin, 2021/03/08
- [lmi] MAKEFLAGS [Was: PATCH: tests build fixes for clang], Greg Chicares, 2021/03/08
- Re: [lmi] MAKEFLAGS, Vadim Zeitlin, 2021/03/09
- Re: [lmi] MAKEFLAGS,
Greg Chicares <=
- Re: [lmi] MAKEFLAGS, Vadim Zeitlin, 2021/03/09
- Re: [lmi] MAKEFLAGS, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/09
Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/08
Re: [lmi] PATCH: tests build fixes for clang, Greg Chicares, 2021/03/08