[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process)
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:46:38 -0500 (EST) |
> > 3. As to what gets integrated next, I don't see a clear answer.
> > If I had to guess it would be styles _a la_ RP or Configure. But
>
> I'd consider merging to wwwlib5 as the highest priority. It's
possibly (I think that doing Configure first would save us work, but
I can work with either).
> the biggest job on the list, I think, and will require major
> restructuring of the Lynx code. (For starters, can't we make all the
> C code ANSI now, and forget about K&R C?) Therefore, I think we
That's reasonable -- to a point. We've gone to a mixed approach for
tin & vile (ANSI prototypes, use 'const', stdarg.h -- but no # or ##
C preprocessor stuff, since it won't port to VAX C). I'm able to build
with K&R compilers (at least on SunOS, HP-UX) using unproto (though on
HP-UX, the K&R compiler _still_ cannot build X applications). In either
case, I use gcc for the normal builds; unproto is an option.
(I've some sketchy details about unproto under my tin & vile webpages)
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Wayne Buttles, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Al Gilman, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), William Denton, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Al Gilman, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process), Andrew Kuchling, 1997/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0 (process),
T.E.Dickey <=
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Matt Ackeret, 1997/02/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/02/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/02/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0, David Combs, 1997/02/27