[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version) -Reply
From: |
Ian Stirling |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version) -Reply |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 19:37:41 +0000 (GMT) |
>
> TD>
> | some systems have trouble with non-alphanumerics on the end or
> | beginning of a filename (e.g., VMS).
> TD>
>
> WB>
> | Sorry, unclear again...
> |
> | Does anyone have an objection to _lynxrc for the 386/Win32 ports?
> WB>
>
> I think you can count the TD's comment as a vote against using
> "_lynxrc" (since the leading "_" is a non-alphanumeric character). I
> would prefer lynx.rc myself, just because there are already enough
> weird filenames out there, and most of the weird ones are temporary
If compatiblility with win95/dos is an issue, I'd suggest
lynx.ini, due to the fact that .rc is unlikely to be recognised as a
configuration file by someone unfamiliar with *nix.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version), (continued)
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version), Ian Stirling, 1997/03/19
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version), G. Del Merritt, 1997/03/19
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version) -Reply, David Godshall, 1997/03/19
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version), Brian Tillman, x8425, 1997/03/19
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx_386 for DOS Bug Report (14 March 1997 version), Doug Kaufman, 1997/03/20