lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Lynx question: frames and <object>


From: David Combs
Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Lynx question: frames and <object>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 04:31:24 -0800 (PST)

> From address@hidden Mon Mar 23 14:50:06 1998
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 13:58:19 -0800 (PST)
> From: Matt Ackeret <address@hidden>
> 
> On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Al Gilman wrote:
> >Lynx displays both the frames as links and the contents of the
> ><NOFRAMES> section.  Given that competently done <NOFRAMES> 
> >sections are in the minority, and not syntactically verifiable
> >to be such, it is probably best that Lynx continue to do this.
> 
> So this is why we get _usable_ frames sites(*) and "you need a frames capable
> browser to use this site" messages all of the time?
> 
> I think the <NOFRAMES> stuff should not be shown, since Lynx does support
> frames, sort of.
> 
> (*) Well, you're basically "going into" each frame one by one, but it
> still works on a lot of sites.
> 
> 

I've tried "L", to get the list of all
the addresses pointed at by the page,
but haven't had it be much help so far.

Any hints?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]