[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: SINGLE-hyphen vs EM-dash vs "&151"?
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: SINGLE-hyphen vs EM-dash vs "&151"? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:22:04 -0800 (PST) |
> From address@hidden Sat Jan 23 13:33:17 1999
> From: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: lynx-dev LYNX: SINGLE-hyphen vs EM-dash vs "&151"?
>
> >
> > At this addr, with this html:
> >
> > http://www.motherjones.com/news_wire/parrish3.html
> > address@hidden
> >
> >
> > their political will—not to be confused with justice—is done.
> > Unfortunately
> >
> >
> > , it comes out as "political will-not to be confused with justice-is done".
> >
> > Whose fault? Theirs (choosing 151) or lynx's (displaying it)?
> >
> > Of course, it SHOULD display (with proper english style) as
> > "--" in lynx (preferably with surrounding spaces, making it easier
> > to read in ascii-output).
>
> it SHOULD (but I thought about using em-dash a short while ago and found
> that lynx isn't the only program that doesn't display it - iirc, IE 3 and
> NS 4). It'd be fine for Lynx to implement it though.
Doesn't answer the questions (1) whose fault, lynx or the 151, and
(I guess) (2) what IS 151?
IF 151 means em-dash, then lynx is WRONG to show just a
single hyphen -- it makes MISLEADING english, as a hyphen
combines two parts of ONE "word" (logical word, I guess),
whereas " -- " separates two phrases or clauses or whatever
they're called. It is actually sort of serious, not just
"what looks better".
Just my opinion.
Anyway, what IS "151"?
David