[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?
From: |
Tim Benham |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:56:23 +1100 |
Me:
> I have another problem with the configure script now that I am trying
> to install 2.81 at my university (this time as a user without root
> privs). The configure script dies when it discovers that gcc is broken
> despite the fact there is a perfectly good ANSI cc in the PATH. It
> seems to me this could be improved.
Dickey:
> which one is first in the path? (this is really a separate problem
> - autoconf or your environment: the former if the configure script
> picks up a program in the wrong order in the path, or your
> environment if you don't reorder $PATH to make it workable).
gcc was before cc in my path. I just logged in to my uni account to
check whether reversing them would help matters, but the sysadmin
(bless his soul) had fixed gcc.
I still think it should be possible to implement some recovery
behavior for the situation where there's a broken gcc in the path,
though I realize this may be a configure issue not a lynx one.
Tim
- Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?, dickey, 1999/03/10