[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:37:22 -0500 (EST) |
>
> Yet more functions that appear to be dead code:
>
> HTAA_checkAuthorization
> HTAA_composeAuthHeaders
> HTAA_encryptPasswd
> HTAA_getGid
> HTAA_getUid
> HTAA_startLogging
> HTAA_statusMessage
> HTAnchor_bookmark
> HTAnchor_makeMainLink
> HTAtom_templateMatches
> HTCardinal
> HTChunkEnsure
> HTHistory_backtrack
> HTHistory_canMoveBy
> HTHistory_leavingFrom
> HTHistory_moveBy
> HTHistory_read
> HTHistory_recall
> HTHistory_record
> HTLoadAnchor
> HTSearchAbsolute
> HTStyleSheetRemoveStyle
> LYSkipCNonBlanks
> SNACat
you're being a bit too hasty in your greps (I notice that there's a half
dozen on this list that are in active code). Try to look at the .c _and_
the .h files.
> Based on this, I think I can safely advocate the complete eradication
> of HTAAServ.c and HTHistory.c.
>
> In the next week or so I should be able to get around to a more
> sophisticated analysis of the dead code in lynx, using a graph algorithm
> to look for unattached call trees.
>
> --
> John Bley - address@hidden
> Duke '99 - English/Computer Science
> Since English is a mess, it maps well onto the problem space,
> which is also a mess, which we call reality. - Larry Wall
>
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2, John Bley, 1999/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2,
dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2, dickey, 1999/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2, dickey, 1999/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2, Henry Nelson, 1999/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Dead Code, Part 2, Henry Nelson, 1999/03/11