[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11 |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:10:37 +0300 (MSK) |
3-Dec-2002 14:29 I wrote:
> 2-Dec-2002 00:24 Bela Lubkin wrote:
>> http://www.armory.com/cache/userinfo-t.html
>> performance of an old Lynx 2.8.4dev.20 binary vs. today's 2.8.5dev.11.
>> I also compared output, verifying that they were in fact identical.
>> The results show that Leonid grossly underestimated the benefits of his
>> changes:
>> File 2.8.4dev.20 2.8.5dev.11
>> -dump -dump
>> -dump -nolist -dump -nolist
>> userinfo450.html 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06
>> userinfo450-t.html 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.10
>> userinfo3600.html 4.95 2.50 0.48 0.42
>> userinfo3600-t.html 5.30 4.56 0.54 2.50
>> userinfo7200.html 28.24 10.54 0.93 0.83
>> userinfo7200-t.html 27.93 20.25 1.08 10.29
>> Oddly, `lynx -dump -nolist` is now slower than `lynx -dump` in some
>> cases...
> Still cannot figure why -nolist is slower, but you help me fix
> one more quadratic behaviour issue:
> userinfoNNN-t.html is a huge table with lots of anchors.
...
Apparently, lynx with -nolist option on the above test file
shows STbl (visualy improved simple tables) which eats CPU,
while without the flag tables are collapsed for some reason -
try "links are numbered" in the Options menu for such presentation.
Not sure whether this is a bug or just the table happens to be too wide
in this case.
Leonid.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, (continued)
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Bela Lubkin, 2002/12/03
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Thomas Dickey, 2002/12/03
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Clemens Fischer, 2002/12/03
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Thomas Dickey, 2002/12/03
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Bela Lubkin, 2002/12/04
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Leonid Pauzner, 2002/12/04
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/12/04
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Leonid Pauzner, 2002/12/03
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Bela Lubkin, 2002/12/04
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Leonid Pauzner, 2002/12/04
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11,
Leonid Pauzner <=
- Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Leonid Pauzner, 2002/12/04
Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/12/02
Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Leonid Pauzner, 2002/12/02
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, pg, 2002/12/02
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11, Webmaster Jim, 2002/12/03