|
From: | Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: | Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] SUBSTRING and SET-STRING-MAXIMUM-LENGTH! |
Date: | Sun, 6 Sep 2009 01:03:19 -0400 |
User-agent: | IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+ |
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:50:24 -0700 From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden> I just pushed a change that restored everything to the way it was. I'll try to figure out a way to implement string-head! that is portable. Why do we need something portable? What's wrong with this? (define (string-head! string end) (guarantee-string string 'STRING-HEAD!) (guarantee-substring-end-index end (string-maximum-length string) 'STRING-HEAD!) (set-string-maximum-length! string end) ;; SET-STRING-MAXIMUM-LENGTH! has no effect in some implementations ;; of the microcode. If so, just copy the head. (if (fix:= end (string-maximum-length string)) string (%substring string 0 end)))
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |