[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git
From: |
Chris Hanson |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 00:09:37 -0700 |
Yet another follow-up on this. I've deleted the unwanted HEAD branch
on savannah. In order to get rid of it in your local repo, do this:
git remote set-head origin -d
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Chris Hanson<address@hidden> wrote:
> This problem with HEAD and master causing "is at ... but expected" is
> caused by there being a HEAD symbolic reference in the upstream bare
> repo. Remove the HEAD reference from that repo and the problem should
> go away.
>
> The error is harmless, by the way. It just indicates confusion on
> git's part; the repo is fine and everything is updated as it should
> have been.
>
> I just filed a service request to savannah to get the HEAD reference
> removed from our central repo.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Taylor R Campbell<address@hidden> wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:36:30 -0700
>> From: Chris Hanson <address@hidden>
>>
>> According to the "git magic" site, most git commands don't work as
>> expected on bare repos. You need to use --git-dir or --bare, which
>> are global git options (see "man git"). The usage, afaict, is either
>>
>> git pull --git-dir=..../stage.git
>>
>> or alternatively
>>
>> cd ..../stage.git; git pull --bare
>>
>> I think git push works similarly. You shouldn't have to specify where
>> to push or pull, when the repo was created with git clone; that
>> information is supposed to be stored in ..../stage.git/config. For
>> reference, I've attached the .git/config from my tree.
>>
>> Well, someone much more experienced with Git than I suggested that I
>> run in the working directory
>>
>> work% git pull ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/mit-scheme.git
>> refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/savannah/master
>>
>> That seemed to work to merge the current state of the public
>> repository into my working repository, and created what is as far as I
>> can tell a spurious commit whose only purpose is to chronicle the fact
>> that I ran `git pull' with local changes. Then I pushed into the
>> staging repository, and that seemed happy, so I ran another build to
>> confirm that my changes worked, and finally ran
>>
>> stage.git% git push ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/mit-scheme.git
>> Counting objects: 18, done.
>> Delta compression using up to 2 threads.
>> Compressing objects: 100% (10/10), done.
>> Writing objects: 100% (10/10), 1.21 KiB, done.
>> Total 10 (delta 8), reused 0 (delta 0)
>> To ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/mit-scheme.git
>> 6bceccb..a679dfd master -> master
>> stage.git% cd ../clean
>> clean% git pull
>> remote: Counting objects: 18, done.
>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (10/10), done.
>> remote: Total 10 (delta 8), reused 0 (delta 0)
>> Unpacking objects: 100% (10/10), done.
>> From git://git.savannah.gnu.org/mit-scheme
>> + 6bceccb...f2b42a4 HEAD -> origin/HEAD (forced update)
>> error: Ref refs/remotes/origin/master is at
>> f2b42a44bdb4ba11b97b4d7360fc1031700ba8c3 but expected
>> 6bceccb3d92ab8ca5eb267d95dca74c24b7b1c5d
>> ! 6bceccb..a679dfd master -> origin/master (unable to update local
>> ref)
>>
>> What have I done wrong now? `clean' is a completely clean repository
>> where I have run nothing but `git pull' and non-destructive commands,
>> and which I cloned from <git://git.sv.gnu.org/mit-scheme.git>. Did my
>> changes get propagated to the public repository?
>>
>
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/05
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/05
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/05
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git,
Chris Hanson <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] using git, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/06