[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!
From: |
Joe Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head! |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:48:34 -0700 |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:
> In any case, I thought the point of
> STRING-HEAD! was to reduce pressure on the garbage collector, not to
> reduce the time spent switching between Scheme land and C land, and we
> can reduce pressure on the garbage collector just by using the
> primitive SET-STRING-MAXIMUM-LENGTH! if it's available.
Has anyone measured the performance difference between smashing
the string head and just taking a substring? I'd bet it's a pretty minimal
improvement against the background of the other things that happen during I/O.
--
~jrm
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!,
Joe Marshall <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/24