[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!
From: |
Joe Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head! |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:10:12 -0700 |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:48:34 -0700
> From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>
>
> Has anyone measured the performance difference between smashing
> the string head and just taking a substring? I'd bet it's a pretty minimal
> improvement against the background of the other things that happen during
> I/O.
>
> I conducted a thoroughly unscientific comparison whose source code is
> attached: making a string of length 2^(i + 1), taking a prefix of
> length 2^i, and then discarding it, repeating the process ten thousand
> times.
I haven't seen much production code that uses it in this way.
I don't doubt that it is quicker to truncate the string than to copy it. I was
wondering if it took up a significant amount of time when calling
WITH-OUTPUT-TO-STRING or INPUT-PORT/READ-STRING
--
~jrm
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Chris Hanson, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/09/24
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] string-head!,
Joe Marshall <=