Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] state space primitives

[Chris Hanson]

Yes, by all means get rid of them.

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:
> The archaic state space primitives are not only archaic but apparently
> completely broken too:
>
> ((make-primitive-procedure 'execute-at-new-state-point 4)
>  #f (lambda () 0) (lambda () 1) (lambda () 2))
> ;Hardware trap SIGSEGV: "Address not mapped to object"
>
> Does anyone care about these primitives?  Can we just get rid of all
> the microcode's state space cruft?
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
>