[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
[MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:32:27 -0700 |
> From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:11:06 -0700
>
> [...] However, the fixed-point expansion does not have the implicit
> assignment that the letrec expansion has. This makes it slightly
> easier to analyze, and SF is able to report if the name is actually
> used in the body. I uncovered a few places in the code where a
> named-let was written, but the name was never invoked.
Cool; not just an amusement! You do not want to make this the default
because you do not have a pretty-printer for it?
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Joe Marshall, 2011/06/14
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement,
Matt Birkholz <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Joe Marshall, 2011/06/15
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/15
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Joe Marshall, 2011/06/17
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/17
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Joe Marshall, 2011/06/17
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/17
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/17