mit-scheme-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement


From: Taylor R Campbell
Subject: Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] For your amusement
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:01:24 +0000
User-agent: IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/9.1

   Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:27 -0700
   From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>

   That's one reason.  The other is that it seems to slow things down by
   a small, but noticeable amount.  I don't yet understand why because
   the emitted code looks exactly the same (modulo naming).  Of course
   there's no reason to slow things down for *exactly* the same code.

Extra time spent in flow analysis and closure analysis?  (Perhaps
another reason to avoid using it by default is the scary comment in
compiler/fgopt/closan.scm...)  Or are you noticing time spent running
particular code that uses named LET, not building the whole system
overall?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]