[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV.
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV. |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:06:03 -0700 |
> From: Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:13:56 +0000
>
> [...]
>
> It would be more cool if floenv.scm set up the machine with a default
> environment, via libc. It would be more "portable" (modulo
> portabilitatedness of fenv.h), no?
>
> I don't understand. Can you elaborate? We already use libc to
> control the floating-point environment if we can, and only fall back
> to machine-specific code if we can't.
Yes, sorry. "More cool" was calling flo:set-environment! (libc) in
savres.scm and make.scm, and removing the (non-libc) fpu inits. Less
cool was "just mask DENORM". The former seems more portabicklish,
assuming fenv.h is not a stranger to most.
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/11
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/11
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/11
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/11
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/12
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/16
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/18
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/18
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV.,
Matt Birkholz <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Ubuntu 11.04 and FE_DFL_ENV., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/19