mit-scheme-devel
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][Date Next][
Thread Prev
][Thread Next][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
From
:
David Gray
Subject
:
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
Date
:
Fri, 16 May 2014 16:54:04 +0300
I mis-remembered
"However, on 32-bit architectures, the portable-code binaries can address larger amounts of virtual memory than the native-code binaries, so it is reasonable (and supported) to use both kinds on the same machine."
as all architectures
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
[MIT-Scheme-devel] Threads
,
David Gray
,
2014/05/14
[MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
,
David Gray
,
2014/05/14
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
,
Taylor R Campbell
,
2014/05/15
[MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
,
Matt Birkholz
,
2014/05/15
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
,
David Gray
,
2014/05/16
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
,
Taylor R Campbell
,
2014/05/16
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
,
David Gray
<=
Prev by Date:
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
Previous by thread:
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] threads
Index(es):
Date
Thread