[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[MIT-Scheme-devel] syntax.c
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
[MIT-Scheme-devel] syntax.c |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:00:16 -0700 |
Do we need (performance-wise, on some platform we care about) the 11
primitives in syntax.c? It's just that GCC 7 is sortof down on
syntax.c (because of -Wimplicit-fallthrough). And re-writing the 11 in
Scheme using generic string ops would help Edwin deal with ustring
buffers some day (or just slow things down today?).
This is a subliminal suggestion to the net gods. I wasn't proposing to
do the work. :-}
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] syntax.c,
Matt Birkholz <=