Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] syntax.c

[Taylor R Campbell]

> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:00:16 -0700
> From: Matt Birkholz <address@hidden>
> 
> Do we need (performance-wise, on some platform we care about) the 11
> primitives in syntax.c?  It's just that GCC 7 is sortof down on
> syntax.c (because of -Wimplicit-fallthrough).  And re-writing the 11 in
> Scheme using generic string ops would help Edwin deal with ustring
> buffers some day (or just slow things down today?).
> 
> This is a subliminal suggestion to the net gods.  I wasn't proposing to
> do the work. :-}

I don't really care, but can't you just add /*FALLTHROUGH*/
annotations to appease GCC?