[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling
From: |
Richard Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:16:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:12:29PM -0500, Robert Fischer wrote:
> Yeah, that's what it's called, but the wiki just called it
> "libcamlrun.so", and that was what was referenced in the
> Makefile.config, so I went with that. Is the only consequence of
> calling it libcamlrun.so a performance hit due to the dynamic link, or
> should I go back and try this approach?
The name shouldn't make any difference.
There is a (small) performance penalty from using a shared library
over a static library, but on x86-64 you don't have any choice in the
matter because of shortcomings in the Linux linker.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
- [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Robert Fischer, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Richard Jones, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Robert Fischer, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Robert Fischer, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Robert Fischer, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Richard Jones, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Robert Fischer, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling,
Richard Jones <=
- Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling, Robert Fischer, 2008/04/23