Re: outstanding issues

[Rory Toma]

I vote for releasing without and also without changing too much of the
dependency code. What I'd like to do for 4.0 is incorporate external
data sources (like a gdbm file) to replace the processlist struct. Doing
so will require rewriting lots of code, and I think we'll end up with
something that's nice and clean. If we try to fix the below now, it'll
be a hack, and we really don't have much in the way of a good reason,
feature-wise, to change this.

> 
> 2.) it will be needed to keep state of processes do_validate flag in the 
> case of configuration reload. We discussed it, Rory and me submitted 
> some hints. There is only one question - shall we release monit without 
> this feature (now) or add it to 3.1?
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
-- 
Rory Toma               address@hidden
VP of Run Level 5       http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital           http://www.digeo.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part