[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: outstanding issues
From: |
Rory Toma |
Subject: |
Re: outstanding issues |
Date: |
17 Dec 2002 14:23:50 -0800 |
The problem was that I was being stupid. 8-)
It turns out that you have to have the monit http daemon set the flag,
otherwise, it gets set in the wrong address space.
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 14:05, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 2.) it will be needed to keep state of processes do_validate flag in
> > the case of configuration reload. We discussed it, Rory and me
> > submitted some hints. There is only one question - shall we release
> > monit without this feature (now) or add it to 3.1?
>
> Bear with me, what was the deal again with the do_validate flag, I
> remember that it was not set properly but what was the reason and why
> was it a problem?
--
Rory Toma address@hidden
VP of Run Level 5 http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital http://www.digeo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part