Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?

[rory]

> Christian Hopp wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Martin Pala wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You are right Christian - the result of the election was realy strange
>>>:) I'm neutral in this question not because of try to make pleasure
>>>for someone, but just because i'm not against it as well as i don't
>>>think that it is 'must have' feature.
>>>
>>>Probably Jan's decision is good conclusion for the election - we have
>>>4 votes => (0+0+0+1)/4 = 1/4 which is too low for change. What about
>>>take care about elections so, that the quotient of the election which
>>>equals to votes_summary/electors_count must be >=0.5 to succeed? In
>>>can solve similar situations well.
>>>
>>>Martin
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Or we do it like it like the jakarta voting.  We say we need at least
>>two "+1" votes and more "+1" votes then "-1" votes.  And for major
>>decisions we need at least two "+1" votes and no "-1" votes.
>>
>>Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I agree with it
>

+1. 8-)