[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:18:49 -0500 |
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 22:21 +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> I was just doing a quick estimate, and I think it's likely that the
> SHA1 and RSA cost for checking everything in the current venge.net
> repository is a minute or two rather than an hour or two.
>
> If monotone were to give up verification, then it would have to be
> because that would avoid some other aspects of work: reconstructing
> files, reversing deltas, or whatever.
Netsync (initial pull, counting both server and client) appears to be:
13% libz (56% compression + 22% decompression + housekeeping)
11% Botan::SHA_160::hash
6% compute_delta_insns (strangely, this is 99% from compute_delta...
which gets .09% of total)
5% _int_malloc
5% memcpy
(oprofile, callgraph depth 10, and I'm not entirely certain I'm reading
everything right. In particular, commands::process, cpp_main, and the
like all get 0. Or maybe everything just happens more than 10 calls down
from these?)
Tim
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Justin Patrin, 2006/04/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, hendrik, 2006/04/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Justin Patrin, 2006/04/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Bruce Stephens, 2006/04/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Bruce Stephens, 2006/04/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey,
Timothy Brownawell <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Koen Kooi, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Timothy Brownawell, 2006/04/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/29
- gzipping analysis (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/30
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Lapo Luchini, 2006/04/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Jon Bright, 2006/04/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/30