[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:50:24 -0500 |
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 20:39 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 22:21 +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> >
> >>I was just doing a quick estimate, and I think it's likely that the
> >>SHA1 and RSA cost for checking everything in the current venge.net
> >>repository is a minute or two rather than an hour or two.
> >>
> >>If monotone were to give up verification, then it would have to be
> >>because that would avoid some other aspects of work: reconstructing
> >>files, reversing deltas, or whatever.
> >
> >
> > Netsync (initial pull, counting both server and client) appears to be:
> > 13% libz (56% compression + 22% decompression + housekeeping)
> > 11% Botan::SHA_160::hash
> > 6% compute_delta_insns (strangely, this is 99% from compute_delta...
> > which gets .09% of total)
> > 5% _int_malloc
> > 5% memcpy
>
> this adds up to 40% if I'm reading it right, where did the other 60% go?
A bunch of smaller ones, 3.6% and less. Can't list them all, and this
just seemed a good place to stop. All together, they do add up to about
100%.
Tim
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, hendrik, 2006/04/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Justin Patrin, 2006/04/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Bruce Stephens, 2006/04/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Bruce Stephens, 2006/04/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Timothy Brownawell, 2006/04/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Koen Kooi, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey,
Timothy Brownawell <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/29
- gzipping analysis (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/04/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/30
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Lapo Luchini, 2006/04/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Jon Bright, 2006/04/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/04/30
- [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Graydon Hoare, 2006/04/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey, Patrick Mauritz, 2006/04/30