[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mhl nocomponent
From: |
Jon Steinhart |
Subject: |
Re: mhl nocomponent |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:44:23 -0700 |
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH. In
> >general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of
> >hand from the MS/Outlook space. We probably need a better list of
> >common "this is junk" header list that probably has to have wildcards in
> >it.
>
> Sigh. I mean, it seems like this has been expanding, and "everybody
> else" doesn't consider it a problem since every OTHER MUA only shows
> "relevant" headers by default. Even Robert Elz (who was a long-time
> proponent of showing those headers) finally gave up and deleted the
> extras:nocomponent line in his mhl file:
>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2021-06/msg00025.html
>
> I am thinking maybe we should change the nmh default mhl files as well
> to recognize current reality (in that thread Ralph also chimed in and
> said the current default doesn't make sense).
>
> --Ken
It does seem like the size of the headers exceeds the size of the body
in a lot of cases :-)
Jon
Re: mhl nocomponent, David Levine, 2023/04/01