[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57138] Categorize graphics properties for better doc readability

[Pantxo Diribarne]

Follow-up Comment #10, bug#57138 (group octave):

Thanks @nrjank for the hard work!

Shouldn't we push actually unused properties into the "Unused" category? I
thinks of properties like figure/axes "clipping" that incidentally exist
because any graphics objects inherits those, but that make no sense. Those are
unused and won't ever be. 

On the other hand, for example axes "clippingstyle" is unused because the
underlying rendering code has not been implemented. So the doc should say "Not
implemented" while the category could still remain "Display".

 


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57138>

_______________________________________________
Message posté via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/