[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 when?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 when? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:29:51 +0100 |
On 12/18/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello Benjamin
>
> Benjamin wrote
> > I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
> > functions.
> > Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first
> > install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
> >
> > It would also allow easier use of a packaged editor with the mingw binaries.
>
> That's a good idea!!
> I also vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core functions.
Why not also package octave-forge in the mingw binaries?
Michael.
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Kai Habel, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Benjamin Lindner, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, David Bateman, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19