[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 when?
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 when? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:28:07 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
Sorry I have just passed over your reply to Benjamin.
Thanks for your accepting Benjamin's proposal.
Tatsuro
--- "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 18-Dec-2007, Benjamin Lindner wrote:
>
> | I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
> | functions.
> | Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first
> | install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
>
> OK, I added edit.m to Octave because it is a single .m file, so moving
> it is easy.
>
> I don't plan to move imread/imwrite to Octave until after 3.0 because
> they are more complex and involve library dependencies.
>
> jwe
>
--- "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 20-Dec-2007, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>
> | Is the proporsal from the Bejamin, which I agreed with, to be accepted or
> not?
>
> Precisely which proposal is that?
>
> jwe
>
--------------------------------------
New Design Yahoo! JAPAN 2008/01/01
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/newdesign/
- Re: 3.0 when?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0 when?, Benjamin Lindner, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: 3.0 when?, David Bateman, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19