[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:20:51 +0100 |
On 1/4/08, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Please try the following patch. I'm not sure it is the best fix, but
> it should avoid the problem. Maybe it would be better to arrange for
> scope_stack to always have at least two elements with -1 at the bottom
> of the stack.
This is what I did, but now I have another segmentation fault (however I
don't know if it's related to the same problem). When I run a second time
"gnuplot_binary", I get a crash with the backtrace attached (sorry, MSVC
backtrace, less readable than gdb). Any idea?
Michael.
backtrace.txt
Description: Text document
- octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/07
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/07
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/08