[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:40:07 -0500 |
On 7-Jan-2008, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On 1/5/08, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> wrote:
| > So, in summary, I think that another possible solution would be to avoid
| > to create the octave_dld_function in the oct-file, such that the
corresponding
| > virtual destructor code will not be executed in the oct-file address space.
| > This used to be the case before the object-branch merge, but I don't know
| > whether this is still feasible...
|
| After some experiments, the attached patch should solve the problem.
| Note that I didn't check it yet, I'll try to check it this evening. However, I
| could check the concept on some test code and it seems to work
| (you can see the test code at
| http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2641079&SiteID=1).
|
| If it compiles and run OK under Linux, it should be OK under MSVC.
It seems to work fine for me. I applied the patch and checked it in.
Thanks,
jwe
- octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/07
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/08