[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New procedure bicgstab
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: New procedure bicgstab |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:02:04 +0100 |
man, 22 12 2008 kl. 11:05 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:14 AM, R! <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I understand that good preconditioning is very important for procedure like
> > bicgstab and cgs which I wrote, so maybe I can now try to write ILU
> > procedure for Octave if you find it useful.
> >
> > But I'm also interested in your opinion about bicgstab now.
> >
>
> Certainly it's useful. Not even in the sparse world is every matrix
> ill-conditioned.
> The Krylov solvers are IMHO an important missing piece in Octave. It's
> great someone took up the job. Even not-quite-optimized
> implementations are a good take-off.
> Having gmres would be great, too.
Where should we put stuff like this? The 'optimization' package is
option.
Soren
- New procedure bicgstab, R!, 2008/12/19
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, Søren Hauberg, 2008/12/19
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, David Bateman, 2008/12/19
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, R!, 2008/12/22
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/22
- Re: New procedure bicgstab,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, Ben Abbott, 2008/12/22
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/12/22
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, David Bateman, 2008/12/22
- Re: New procedure bicgstab, David Bateman, 2008/12/22
Re: New procedure bicgstab, Ben Abbott, 2008/12/19