[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.2.3 RC2
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: 3.2.3 RC2 |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:21:22 -0500 |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Marco Atzeri<address@hidden> wrote:
> on 3..2.3-RC1 cygwin I had
>
> ***** testif HAVE_ARPACK
> [u2,s2,v2,flag] = svds(a,k,0);
> s2 = diag(s2);
> assert(flag,!1);
> assert(s(k:-1:1), s2, 1e-10);
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (s (k:-1:1),s2,1e-10) expected
> 38.034
> 38.034
> 38.015
> 38.015
> 38.004
> 38.004
> but got
> 38.060
> 38.034
> 38.034
> 38.015
> 38.015
> 38..004
> 38.004
> Dimensions don't match>>>>>
>
> Is eventually the expected value wrong ?
>
> Marco
>
It works fine on x86_64, so I tend to blame the problems like this on
wonders of i387 floating point math...
I am surprised that your expected values not the same as mine...
Dmitri.
--
- 3.2.3 RC2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/09/01
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/01
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/09/01
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2009/09/01
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Marco Atzeri, 2009/09/01
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2,
Dmitri A. Sergatskov <=
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, John W. Eaton, 2009/09/02
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2009/09/02
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, David Bateman, 2009/09/03
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Marco Atzeri, 2009/09/03
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/01
- Re: 3.2.3 RC2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/01
Re: 3.2.3 RC2, John W. Eaton, 2009/09/01