[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logos proposal
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: Logos proposal |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:15:18 -0500 |
On 14 June 2010 17:02, Fotios Kasolis <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> What about those?
How about instead O\mathbb{C}^\mathrm{T}\forall\nu\epsilon
I.e. just pass the mathbb to C instead of O, suggesting the complex
numbers (\mathbb{O} isn't as common as \mathbb{C}). The T is nice,
suggests transpose.
- Re: Logos proposal, (continued)
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Thomas Weber, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Svante Signell, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/16
- Re: Logos proposal, Ben Barrowes, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/17