[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logos proposal
From: |
Fotios Kasolis |
Subject: |
Re: Logos proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:48:21 +0200 |
On Jun 15, 2010, at 4:37 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 2010/6/15 Fotios Kasolis <address@hidden>:
>> Try the following (i like all of them)
>> 1) \mathcal{O}\text{C}^\mathrm{T}\forall\beta\mathcal{E}
>> 2) \mathbb{O}\text{C}^\text{T}\forall\vec{\mathcal{V}}\exists
>> 3) \mathbb{O}\text{C}^\text{T}\forall\vec{\mathcal{V}}e
>
> I like the first one, except for the beta. It's not phonetically
> equivalent to a v, but I think Greek doesn't distinguish those two
> phonemes.
>
> All I don't like is the \mathbb{O}, because it doesn't have a common
> meaning I can think of.
Beta is phonetically equivalent to v(!!!). What you wrote with \nu is not
equivalent because you must read it like "octane" instead.
Regarding \mathbb{O} it is just a matter of taste.
/Fotios
- Re: Logos proposal, (continued)
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/14
- Re: Logos proposal, Thomas Weber, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal,
Fotios Kasolis <=
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Svante Signell, 2010/06/15
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/16
- Re: Logos proposal, Ben Barrowes, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Ben Barrowes, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/18