octave-maintainers
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: is_ignored_output function
From
:
Judd Storrs
Subject
:
Re: is_ignored_output function
Date
:
Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:44:39 -0400
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Rik
<
address@hidden
>
wrote:
I would suggest a positive verb such as:
iswanted
isused
isused_output
iswanted_output
What about:
isargout
I like that it is terse (a plus in my book) and is similar in vein to nargout, nargin, varargout, varargin etc.
--judd
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
is_ignored_output function
,
Rik
,
2010/08/02
is_ignored_output function
,
John W. Eaton
,
2010/08/02
Re: is_ignored_output function
,
Judd Storrs
<=
Re: is_ignored_output function
,
Rik
,
2010/08/02
Re: is_ignored_output function
,
Jaroslav Hajek
,
2010/08/03
Re: is_ignored_output function
,
Rik
,
2010/08/03
Re: is_ignored_output function
,
Jaroslav Hajek
,
2010/08/02
Prev by Date:
is_ignored_output function
Next by Date:
Re: is_ignored_output function
Previous by thread:
is_ignored_output function
Next by thread:
Re: is_ignored_output function
Index(es):
Date
Thread