[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is_ignored_output function
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: is_ignored_output function |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:15:55 -0700 |
Judd Storrs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Rik <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> I would suggest a positive verb such as:
> iswanted
> isused
> isused_output
> iswanted_output
>
>
> What about:
>
> isargout
>
> I like that it is terse (a plus in my book) and is similar in vein to
> nargout, nargin, varargout, varargin etc.
I like this suggestion as well. It "feels" like it belongs to the same
family of functions as nargin, nargout, etc.
--Rik