Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK)

[John W. Eaton]

On 10-Jan-2011, logari81 wrote:

| 3. Esthetically, I have no preference between the current implementation
| in octave and the one in my patch. The reason for suggesting this patch
| was for:
| a. being more consistent with latest ML versions and

To me, this doesn't matter in this case, since it is just a display issue.

| b. having less problems with positioning of the title (in the current
| implementation when the xy axes ticks come to the upper part of the axes
| box, we'll have to elevate the title correspondingly.)

That's a good reason to make the change.

| I do not mind if we keep the current implementation or the one in my
| patch. In any case please let us decide for one of both so that I know
| if I need to adapt the following title positioning patch or not:
| http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/c9df571efe95

Since you've already done the work and if it avoids additional work
of tweaking the title position, then I think we should apply the change.

Thanks,

jwe