[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4).
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4). |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 03:50:45 -0500 |
On 7-Feb-2011, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
| Perhaps I have misled after seeing loading time seeing on MinGW and Cygwin.
| Even on 3.3, after startup message, it takes a time the prompt to appear.
|
| Perhaps, initialization process is slow in the current 3.3 version.
| What is the difference in the start up process between 3.2 and 3.3?
Octave startup doesn't seem slow on my system, so I think you'll have
to do some debugging to find out why it is slow for you. I'd start by
running Octave under gdb, setting a breakpoint in octave_main, and
then stepping through it to see which function calls take significant
amounts of time.
jwe
- startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/02/06
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/02/06
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4).,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/02/07
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., marco atzeri, 2011/02/07
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/02/07
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., Richard Campbell, 2011/02/07
- Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4)., marco atzeri, 2011/02/07