[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4).
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: startup order difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (3.4). |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:15:04 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- "John W. Eaton"wrote:
> On 7-Feb-2011, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>
> | Perhaps I have misled after seeing loading time seeing on MinGW and Cygwin.
> | Even on 3.3, after startup message, it takes a time the prompt to appear.
> |
> | Perhaps, initialization process is slow in the current 3.3 version.
> | What is the difference in the start up process between 3.2 and 3.3?
>
> Octave startup doesn't seem slow on my system, so I think you'll have
> to do some debugging to find out why it is slow for you. I'd start by
> running Octave under gdb, setting a breakpoint in octave_main, and
> then stepping through it to see which function calls take significant
> amounts of time.
I do not use dubbuging environments for execution.
Startup slowness is also found in octave on cygwin by marco although I feel
that slowness degree is
smaller on the cygwin.
Is the windows specific phenomenon?
Regards
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/