[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New strsplit function
From: |
Abbott, Ben |
Subject: |
Re: New strsplit function |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:39:15 +0000 |
On Jun 3, 2013, at 8:05 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 05/16/2013 03:34 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> I've untangled the "legacy" option from the rest, and added some tests.
>> This "should" be compatible with Matlab. If its ok with you, I'll push this
>> and follow up with another change to introduce cstrsplit.m and remove the
>> "legacy" code form strsplit.m
>
> Sorry, I missed this message until now when I was looking to see what had
> happened with this change.
>
> Yes, go ahead and apply the change. Unfortunately, there may be some
> conflicts now as I see there was a recent change to strsplit.m to improve
> input argument checking.
>
> I'm not sure about the name cstrsplit. The cstrcat function was named that
> way because it behaves more like the C library function strcat, not because
> it is compatible with previous versions of Octave. Maybe ostrsplit (o ==
> old) instead?
>
> jwe
Ok, thanks for getting back to this. I hope to clean this all up by the end of
the week.
Ben